Springer-Lyle News Updates

latest legal news from the law firm of Springer-Lyle

1807 Westminster
Denton, TX 76205

940.387.0404

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Firm Overview
    • Attorney Profiles
  • Areas of Practice
  • Articles and Cases
  • What’s In the News
  • Resources
  • Videos
    • Who is Springer-Lyle?
    • FAQ Videos
      • FAQs on Business Litigation
      • FAQs on Healthcare, Medical & Pharmaceutical Cases
      • FAQs on Personal Injury, Automobile & Trucking Accidents
      • FAQs on Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • FAQs on Probate Cases
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Blog Articles / Articles of Interest / Sentimental Value of Pets to be Heard by Texas Supreme Court

Sentimental Value of Pets to be Heard by Texas Supreme Court

September 26, 2012 By admin Leave a Comment

Errant euthanasia of pets will be reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court for “sentimental damages”, i.e. valuation beyond the replacement price of the pet. Please read this interesting article from the Fort Worth Star Telegram’s Elizabeth Campbell. Springer Lyle will post any updates to the court’s decisions as this case progresses.

By Elizabeth Campbell of the Fort Worth Star Telegram

pet and pet owner

Texas Supreme Court will hear case regarding sentimental value of pets lost due to errant euthanasia.

The Texas Supreme Court will weigh in on a case to determine whether pet owners can claim damages for the sentimental value rather than the market value of their animals.

Last week, the state’s highest civil court agreed to hear oral arguments after a former Fort Worth animal shelter employee appealed a landmark ruling out of the 2nd Court of Appeals in Fort Worth that said owners can claim sentimental value for their deceased pets, overturning a 120-year-old state Supreme Court decision stating that a person can only sue for the market value of a pet.

The case is being watched by animal advocates, pet product manufacturers and veterinary groups, said Randy Turner, an attorney who is representing a Fort Worth family who sued the animal shelter employee after their dog, an 8-year-old Labrador mix named Avery, was mistakenly euthanized three years ago.

“Veterinarians are terrified of this case. They think it’s going to result in huge jury verdicts and skyrocketing malpractice insurance premiums,” Turner said.

Controversial ruling

John Cayce, an attorney and retired chief justice of the Fort Worth appeals court who is representing the former animal shelter employee, Carla Strickland, in her appeal, said pet owners can already sue for reasonable damages if their animal is killed accidentally.

“The lower court ruling expands the law for pet owners to recover unlimited emotional damages, which is more than someone can recover for a parent or grandparent,” Cayce said.

Cayce said the Fort Worth appeals court ruling would also have a “devastating” effect on the economy, forcing veterinarians to pay more for malpractice insurance and pet owners to pay more for vet visits.

Although dogs are beloved companions, Cayce wrote, “They should not be placed into this intimate familiar category as a matter of public policy.”

Because cities are generally immune from lawsuits, the former shelter employee was sued. However, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that government employees can also claim immunity in most cases.

Turner said Texans can sue for sentimental value on property from photos to their grandmother’s wedding veil, and that it does not make sense to exclude pets.

“A pet is the most sentimental piece of property you own,” he said. “You can recover the sentimental value of the photo of your dog, but not the dog,” Turner said.

Mistakenly euthanized

The debate over whether a the loss of a pet falls under sentimental value began when Avery escaped from Kathryn and Jeremy Medlens’ back yard during a thunderstorm.

The next day, Jeremy Medlen went to the animal shelter to get his dog, but found out he had to pay $80 in order for the shelter to release Avery. Medlen didn’t have the cash on hand but was told he could come back to claim Avery.

He returned to the shelter the next day, but matters were complicated even more when he learned that a veterinarian would have to implant a microchip in Avery’s ear.

A “hold for the owner” sign was placed on the dog’s cage to prevent the dog from being put down.

But when Medlen returned to the shelter with money to claim Avery, he learned that his pet had been euthanized by mistake.

The Medlens could not be reached for comment.

Initially, their lawsuit was dismissed in a Tarrant County civil district court because the family sued for the sentimental value and not the market value of their dog, but the Medlens appealed, and the Fort Worth appeals court issued its ruling in favor of the family.

“Dogs are unconditionally devoted to their owners,” the appeals court ruling stated. “We interpret timeworn Supreme Court law to acknowledge that the special value of man’s best friend should be protected.”

Elizabeth Campbell,

817-390-7696

Filed Under: Articles of Interest, Bar Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe by email

Have the latest news from Springer-Lyle
sent to your inbox.

Articles of Interest

Honda Worldwide Recall of Sedans, Minivans, SUVs

By Deepa Seetharaman and Bernie Woodall of Reuters. Honda Motor Co Ltd plans to recall nearly 2 1/2 million vehicles: small SUVs, cars and minivans worldwide. This includes the popular Accord sedan. … [Read More…]

Hip Implant Complaints Increase, While Dangers Are Reviewed

By BARRY MEIER and JANET ROBERTS of the New York Times Published: August 22, 2011 The federal government has received a surge in complaints in recent months about failed hip replacements, suggesting … [Read More…]

Tragedy Brought on by Tainted Fruit

By Moni Basu, CNN William Beach was one of those people who fixated on certain foods. He would eat the same thing voraciously for a few days, and then, when he tired of the same tastes, he moved onto … [Read More…]

No Better Care, Thanks to Tort Reform

Published in The Texas Tribune by guest columnist, Charles M. Silver In 2006, Dr. Howard Marcus wrote that Texas’ 2003 tort reform statute sparked an “amazing turnaround” in which doctors came … [Read More…]

Springer & Lyle, LLP

1807 Westminster
Denton, TX 76205

phone: 940.387.0404
toll-free: 855.387.0404
fax: 940.383.7656

Disclaimer
The contents of this website does not imply legal advise or counsel and does not establish an attorney/client relationship. Please contact us for information on our policies regarding any relationship with clients, potential clients, or non-clients of our firm.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

 

 

make a Pament via LawPay

Return To Top of Page

Copyright © 2023 Springer & Lyle, L.L.P. • • • All Rights Reserved

Website Design by The Crouch Group

Log in