Springer-Lyle News Updates

latest legal news from the law firm of Springer-Lyle

1807 Westminster
Denton, TX 76205

940.387.0404

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Firm Overview
    • Attorney Profiles
  • Areas of Practice
  • Articles and Cases
  • What’s In the News
  • Resources
  • Videos
    • Who is Springer-Lyle?
    • FAQ Videos
      • FAQs on Business Litigation
      • FAQs on Healthcare, Medical & Pharmaceutical Cases
      • FAQs on Personal Injury, Automobile & Trucking Accidents
      • FAQs on Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • FAQs on Probate Cases
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Blog Articles / Articles of Interest / Contrasting the Perverse Incentive of Family Law and Collaborative Divorce

Contrasting the Perverse Incentive of Family Law and Collaborative Divorce

December 30, 2016 By Staff - s.r. Leave a Comment

The Conflict Incentive

conflict in divorce

There is a dirty secret in some family law cases, one that clients only learn about long after they’ve retained counsel, and sometimes only after they look back at the pain, stress, and expense of their divorce.  The secret is that some family lawyers have a perverse incentive.  Attorneys bill clients by the hour to solve their problems.  That means they get paid more if the clients have more problems.  Quite simply, lawyers have an economic incentive to create conflict to bill the file.  Sure they have a lawyers’ creed that says they will be reasonable and advocate settlement, but ask any economist which is a better predictor of human behavior: a creed or an economic incentive?

Worse still, clients often never know, or only realize much later, the role their lawyer plays in either minimizing or exacerbating that costly conflict.  It’s all too easy for a lawyer to receive a curt email from opposing counsel and forward it right along to the client with a message of outrage and indignation instead of restraint and understanding.  In fact, that’s exactly what some clients want to see from their lawyer.  When lawyers ask their clients to take a breath, recognize that while this is personal it’s still business, and try to explain the other side’s point of view, they can be accused of being a pushover.  That’s natural; clients want their lawyers to be tough.  They want them to be as outraged as they are and to convey every bit of outrage and contempt right back to the opposing counsel and their spouse.  For a short while responding to contempt with contempt will make the client feel better, but then of course the litigation, the anxiety, the bitterness and the bills that go with it continue to expand.

The much harder, much less profitable, and often completely thankless job in the short term is telling the client that the other side has a point and they won’t be threatened or insulted into settlement.  Some clients don’t want to hear that.  They will tell you they had rather pay the attorney than the opposing party.  For a short while that may be true, but it’s almost never true in the long run.  We see this in many litigated cases where attorneys file motions to withdraw based on non-payment of attorneys’ fees.

There is Another Option

Potential clients should understand they do have choices in how they go about ending their marriage.  Collaborative divorce is a legal, non-adversarial method available in Texas to address the perverse incentive to bill clients.  Both collaborative law attorneys sign a contract with the clients at the start of the case which requires them to withdraw if the case cannot be resolved during the process.  In fact, the Texas statute which governs collaborative divorce makes this mandatory.  As such, the attorneys are prohibited from acting as litigation counsel if the case is not settled.  This means that from day one, both attorneys are incentivized to work with only one goal in mind; and that is, to settle the case.

That simple agreement, perhaps more than any other feature of collaborative law, creates an atmosphere conducive to settlement and curtails that perverse incentive to create conflict.  The more conflict you create, the more likely a collaborative case will end up litigated and the lawyers will stop getting paid.  That means the lawyers have an economic incentive to stay at the table and continue negotiating, to respond to client demands with understanding, and to control the expectations of their clients.

The Texas Lawyer’s Creed is great and contrary to the cynicism of this post, I honestly believe that most lawyers are good people who put their clients’ best interests above their own bottom line.  Still, lawyers are people and people generally follow economic incentives, so I’ll continue to support collaborative divorce where the economic incentive aligns with the client’s best interests.

Filed Under: Articles of Interest, Family Law, From the Firm Tagged With: Collaborative Divorce, Denton, Divorce, Lawyers, Springer & Lyle

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe by email

Have the latest news from Springer-Lyle
sent to your inbox.

Articles of Interest

Honda Worldwide Recall of Sedans, Minivans, SUVs

By Deepa Seetharaman and Bernie Woodall of Reuters. Honda Motor Co Ltd plans to recall nearly 2 1/2 million vehicles: small SUVs, cars and minivans worldwide. This includes the popular Accord sedan. … [Read More…]

Hip Implant Complaints Increase, While Dangers Are Reviewed

By BARRY MEIER and JANET ROBERTS of the New York Times Published: August 22, 2011 The federal government has received a surge in complaints in recent months about failed hip replacements, suggesting … [Read More…]

Tragedy Brought on by Tainted Fruit

By Moni Basu, CNN William Beach was one of those people who fixated on certain foods. He would eat the same thing voraciously for a few days, and then, when he tired of the same tastes, he moved onto … [Read More…]

No Better Care, Thanks to Tort Reform

Published in The Texas Tribune by guest columnist, Charles M. Silver In 2006, Dr. Howard Marcus wrote that Texas’ 2003 tort reform statute sparked an “amazing turnaround” in which doctors came … [Read More…]

Springer & Lyle, LLP

1807 Westminster
Denton, TX 76205

phone: 940.387.0404
toll-free: 855.387.0404
fax: 940.383.7656

Disclaimer
The contents of this website does not imply legal advise or counsel and does not establish an attorney/client relationship. Please contact us for information on our policies regarding any relationship with clients, potential clients, or non-clients of our firm.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

 

 

make a Pament via LawPay

Return To Top of Page

Copyright © 2023 Springer & Lyle, L.L.P. • • • All Rights Reserved

Website Design by The Crouch Group

Log in