Springer-Lyle News Updates

latest legal news from the law firm of Springer-Lyle

1807 Westminster
Denton, TX 76205

940.387.0404

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Firm Overview
    • Attorney Profiles
  • Areas of Practice
  • Articles and Cases
  • What’s In the News
  • Resources
  • Videos
    • Who is Springer-Lyle?
    • FAQ Videos
      • FAQs on Business Litigation
      • FAQs on Healthcare, Medical & Pharmaceutical Cases
      • FAQs on Personal Injury, Automobile & Trucking Accidents
      • FAQs on Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • FAQs on Probate Cases
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Blog Articles / Articles of Interest / Emotional Distress without Physical Damages – Supreme Court to Review

Emotional Distress without Physical Damages – Supreme Court to Review

January 13, 2012 By admin Leave a Comment

With a hat-tip to the blog, “How Appealing,” the ABA Journal is reporting that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has asked the Washington Supreme Court whether its product liability laws will allow a recovery emotional distress damages without evidence of any other injury. The case is based upon “glob of spit” found by a sheriff’s deputy on a Whopper. The deputy reportedly got an “uneasy feeling” about two of the Burger King’s employees, so he opened his burger before taking a bite. When he looked under the bun, Thomson Reuters News & Insight and SeattlePI.com report that he noticed a “slimy, clear and white phlegm glob.” A Burger King employee’s DNA was identified from the substance. The deputy sued Burger King, but he did not take a bite of the sandwich and does not claim physical injury. Instead, he alleges that the emotional trauma resulted in vomiting, nausea, food anxiety and insomnia. Texas, (and most states) do not allow emotional distress unless physical injuries are also involved. There are a few notable Texas exceptions, such a outrageous or intentional conduct, and other very limited circumstances. It will be interesting to see how the Washington Supreme Court answers the question. For those interested in following it, the case is Bylsma v. Burger King Corp.

Filed Under: Articles of Interest, Bar Related Tagged With: Appellate Court, Damages, Denton, Nausea, Personal Injury, Physical Injury, Recovery, Texas

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe by email

Have the latest news from Springer-Lyle
sent to your inbox.

Articles of Interest

Top Five Things To Look For When Hiring A Personal Injury Attorney

Many lawyers hold themselves out as personal injury attorneys, but what are the top 5 things to look for in hiring a personal injury lawyer?  You’ll find all of those qualities here … [Read More…]

Will Not Wearing A Seat Belt Affect My Personal Injury Claim?

Wearing a seat belt can save your life, but can it also save your personal injury case?  If you’re hurt in a car accident that’s not your fault, you would like to be compensated for your … [Read More…]

Why are Truck Accidents on the Rise in Texas?

According to a report by the American Trucking Association (ATA) released in October 2017, there is a serious shortage of truck drivers nationwide. ATA estimated the shortage would be 50,000 by the … [Read More…]

Drowsy Driving Accidents

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in 2015, over 100,000 motor vehicle crashes are directly attributable to driver fatigue every year. Those are only the drowsy driving … [Read More…]

Springer & Lyle, LLP

1807 Westminster
Denton, TX 76205

phone: 940.387.0404
toll-free: 855.387.0404
fax: 940.383.7656

Disclaimer
The contents of this website does not imply legal advise or counsel and does not establish an attorney/client relationship. Please contact us for information on our policies regarding any relationship with clients, potential clients, or non-clients of our firm.

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

 

 

make a Pament via LawPay

Return To Top of Page

Copyright © 2023 Springer & Lyle, L.L.P. • • • All Rights Reserved

Website Design by The Crouch Group

Log in